Christ the King College
Power & Infrastructure is a relative strength, at 100% of available points. Connectivity is the clearest priority, at 13% of available points.
How to read this score
A total of 61/100 places this school in the Developing tier (50–69). Solid base, clear room to grow.
Higher is stronger. The score reflects what is in place today, not potential.
Each of the six pillars is scored 0–4 on written descriptors, then weighted to a 100-point total. Evidence is graded, and self-reported evidence is capped at 2 of 4 so it cannot score as highly as something an assessor verified.
Read the full methodology →Pillar profile
How this school scores across the six NTRI pillars.
| Power & Infrastructure | 100 percent |
|---|---|
| Devices & Labs | 85 percent |
| Connectivity | 13.3 percent |
| Curriculum & Teachers | 66.3 percent |
| Student Capability | 37.5 percent |
| Leadership & Sustainability | 62.5 percent |
Pillar breakdown
Points earned out of points available.
| Pillar | Earned | Available |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Infrastructure | 15 | 15 |
| Devices & Labs | 17 | 20 |
| Connectivity | 2 | 15 |
| Curriculum & Teachers | 13.3 | 20 |
| Student Capability | 7.5 | 20 |
| Leadership & Sustainability | 6.3 | 10 |
Indicator detail
Every indicator behind this school's score, with the level reached, the evidence used and the points earned.
Power & Infrastructure
15/15 pts · 100%| Indicator | Level | Evidence | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grid reliability | Strong(4/4) | Observed | 6/6 |
| Backup power (solar or generator) | Strong(4/4) | Observed | 5/5 |
| Secure equipment room | Strong(4/4) | Observed | 4/4 |
Devices & Labs
17/20 pts · 85%| Indicator | Level | Evidence | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Devices per student | Strong(4/4) | Measured | 8/8 |
| % of devices functional | Strong(4/4) | Measured | 6/6 |
| Lab access & scheduling | Partial(2/4) | Observed | 3/6 |
Connectivity
2/15 pts · 13.3%| Indicator | Level | Evidence | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-site internet availability | Absent(0/4) | Observed | 0/6 |
| Measured download speed | Absent(0/4) | Measured | 0/5 |
| Staff & student access | Partial(2/4) | Self-reported · capped | 2/4 |
Curriculum & Teachers
13.3/20 pts · 66.3%| Indicator | Level | Evidence | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICT / coding on the timetable | Partial(2/4) | Document | 3.5/7 |
| Teacher digital skills | Established(3/4) | Observed | 5.3/7 |
| Dedicated trained ICT staff | Established(3/4) | Document | 4.5/6 |
Student Capability
7.5/20 pts · 37.5%| Indicator | Level | Evidence | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline digital-literacy test | Absent(0/4) | Measured | 0/10 |
| Aptitude test | Established(3/4) | Measured | 7.5/10 |
Leadership & Sustainability
6.3/10 pts · 62.5%| Indicator | Level | Evidence | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Written ICT plan | Established(3/4) | Document | 2.3/3 |
| Budget & maintenance plan | Strong(4/4) | Document | 4/4 |
| Child-safeguarding & data-protection policy | Absent(0/4) | Document | 0/3 |
Level 0–4: 0 Absent · 1 Nascent · 2 Partial · 3 Established · 4 Strong.
Strengths
- Power & Infrastructure is a relative strength, at 100% of available points.
- Devices & Labs is a relative strength, at 85% of available points.
Priority gaps
- Connectivity is the clearest priority, at 13% of available points.
- Student Capability is the clearest priority, at 38% of available points.
Evidence used
The kinds of evidence behind each pillar. Weaker, self-reported evidence is capped so it cannot score as highly as something we verified.
Assessment history
What Nextwave can offer
Based on this school's lowest pillars, these programmes are the best next step.
We connect schools to low-cost connectivity options and community access models.
Direct student programmes — the Nextwave Bootcamp and NerdHaven — to build hands-on digital skills.
Method & limitations
- Each school is scored independently by two Nextwave assessors; where they differ by more than one point, the score is reconciled with a written note before submission.
- Every indicator carries one evidence type. Self-reported evidence is capped at 2 of 4 points so it cannot score as highly as an assessor-verified result.
- Student capability is measured through sampled tests and reported only as an aggregate for the school — never individual results, names or identifiable photos.
- This profile was scored under rubric v1.0 and is re-assessed annually.
Results are published only with the school's consent. Read the full methodology.
Something look wrong?
Schools and parents can report a correction. We verify each report against our records.
Assessed by Nextwave Infotech · 18 March 2026 · Rubric v1.0. Consent status: granted. Published results are reviewed by the school before publication.